| |
CASES & INVESTIGATIONS |
|
| |
|
|
| |
GENERAL INFORMATION |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
| July 12, 2006 |
CNN Money, "Toyota's totally bizarre recall; Why would Toyota issue a recall designed to make vehicles less safe?"
|
This fall, Toyota will voluntarily recall nearly 160,000 Toyota Tundra pickups so that they can be made less safe for children riding in the front seat.
No, that's not a mistake - at least not on our part.
The recall, announced Monday, is meant to make Tundras comply with a set of safety regulations. The rules say that vehicles built after 2002 must have a child-seat anchor system known as LATCH in the front seat if they also have a front-seat airbag shut-off switch.
The Tundras in question were built with an airbag shut-off switch but not the LATCH system.
The solution? Spend lots of money and inconvenience customers...to remove the airbag shut-off switch.
The move not only doesn't enhance the safety of these vehicles, it actually makes the vehicles unsafe for small children riding in the front seat.
Those shut-off switches exist because airbags can injure and even kill small children even in otherwise minor crashes.
Meanwhile, even without a LATCH system (which stands for lower anchorages and tethers for children), parents can still install safety seats using seatbelts.
Toyota originally discovered the compliance issue and, in a letter to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in July 2005, the company asked regulators to let them to ignore it as "inconsequential to safety."
NHTSA denied that petition. So Toyota asked NHTSA to reconsider, arguing that the solution would be worse than the problem.
"[We] believe that the agency should understand that the likely remedy is to remove the airbag cut-off switches," Toyota lawyers wrote to NHTSA in October of 2005.
Toyota has no other choice, Chris Tinto, Toyota's vice president for regulatory affairs, told CNNMoney.com. Placing the LATCH system in the trucks' front seats would have been far too expensive.
"We still think it's better with the cut-off switches in," said Tinto said. But rules are rules, so it's out with the switches.
What's more, to comply with the rule, Toyota is currently building new Tundra trucks without the switches, Tinto said. |
|
|
| With over
50 attorneys in three offices nationwide, Lieff Cabraser
Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, is widely regarded as
one of the premier personal injury law firms in the
U.S. Since our founding in 1972, we have handled and
resolved thousands of personal injury cases in state
and federal courts throughout the country. For the
last six years, the National Law Journal has
selected Lieff Cabraser as one of the nation's top
plaintiffs' firms. |
| Please click
here to contact an attorney at
Lieff Cabraser to discuss your legal rights at no
cost or obligation. We will handle all inquiries
with the strictest confidentiality and sensitivity.
Inquiries from Canada and other nations are also
welcome. |
| We are committed to providing
the very best representation and support
possible for our clients, and to obtaining
the highest compensation under law for their
claims. |
| We work closely with our
clients throughout the litigation. Each client
is assigned an individual attorney who is
responsible for prosecuting the case and
regularly communicating with the client.
At the same time, our attorneys work as a
team, drawing upon their combined knowledge,
training and skills to provide our clients
with decades of litigation experience. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Trademark Notice:
Vehicle Injuries.com is an electronic newsletter from Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP, a national personal injury attorney | lawyer law firm. Lieff Cabraser is
not affiliated in any way with any trademark owner. The use of any trademarks
on this site is for product identification and information purposes only. |
| Disclaimer: The
hiring of an auto accident lawyer is an important decision. Please read our attorney
advertising disclaimer. |
|
| Copyright © 2008 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP |
|
|
|